Level Funding Is Self-funding: 5 Avoidable Contract Risks, With Frank Pennachio
Episode Description
Level-Funded Health Plan Risks: ERISA Contract Traps, Stop-Loss Gaps, and Surplus Fine Print. Episode 533.
An employer with a fully insured plan told Stacey Richter his renewal this year was 69% — his broker negotiated it down to 50%, which she's not sure she'd classify as a victory. Level funding looks like a lifesaver in that spot, but as Frank Pennachio, author of The Silent Danger and a health insurance veteran with nearly 40 years of experience, explains, level funding is self-funding, with all the fiduciary risk that comes with it. Frank walks through five avoidable contract risks that level-funded plan sponsors fall into regularly, from embedded ERISA violations to stop-loss misalignment to surplus fine print.
WHAT YOU'LL LEARN
✅ Why level funding is self-funding — it feels like a fully insured plan because of the flat monthly payment, but the plan sponsor carries the risks and benefits of self-funding, including fiduciary responsibility
✅ How third-party administrator (TPA) and administrative services only (ASO) agreements can embed ERISA violations the moment they're signed, and why ERISA allows personal assets to be exposed
✅ How stop-loss misalignment leaves the plan sponsor on the hook when plan promises, like eligibility for employees on approved leave, aren't reimbursed under the stop-loss contract
✅ The surplus fine print: incurred but not reported (IBNR) factors, service fees Frank has seen as high as 30%, and surplus returned as an invoice credit instead of a check
✅ Why claims data access promised up front can get signed away, and why fiduciaries must pay prudent fees — like a $50,000 charge to reprice one hospital bill
✅ Four action items: never sign a contract as is, educate the plan sponsor team, run a legit RFP, and pick a broker or EBC with experience and financial alignment
WHY THIS MATTERS
With renewals like 69% and 50%, there's a lot of desperation out there for a lifesaver, and level funding is being sold as one. But as Frank Pennachio quotes Thomas Sowell, "There are no solutions, there are only trade-offs," and the goal is for plan sponsors to pick the trade-offs they want rather than desperate ones. The cost increases will sting, Frank says, and they won't likely bankrupt most companies, but the risks you unknowingly assume could.
MENTIONED IN THIS EPISODE
Website: The Silent Danger, Frank Pennachio's book
Website: The Silent Danger courses from Frank Pennachio
EP478 with Andreas Mang and Jon Camire (Part 1): Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Other Apps
EP479 with Andreas Mang and Jon Camire (Part 2): Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Other Apps
LinkedIn Post by Kimberly Carleson
LinkedIn Post by David Goldfarb on stop-loss cost trends
EP512 with Doug Aldeen: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Other Apps
EP457 with Cynthia Fisher: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Other Apps
Study: Survey by Kaiser Family Foundation
EP453 with Claire Brockbank: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Other Apps
EP433 with Justin Leader: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Other Apps
=== LINKS ===
🔗 Show Notes with all mentioned links
✉️ Enjoy this podcast? Subscribe to the free weekly newsletter
🫙 Support the podcast with a small donation to the Tip Jar
🎤 Follow us on Apple Podcasts
🎤 Follow us on Spotify
📺 Subscribe to our YouTube channel
=== CONNECT WITH THE RHV TEAM ===
✭ LinkedIn ✭ Threads ✭ Bluesky
00:00 Introduction to this episode.
03:37 An overview of today's conversation.
04:57 What level funding is.
06:20 Why level funding is having an explosion in popularity.
08:03 What does an employer need to take into account when considering level funding?
09:36 The first risk of level funding.
12:24 The second risk of level funding.
15:01 The third risk of level funding.
19:45 The fourth risk of level funding.
21:46 The fifth risk of level funding.
24:41 Actionable strategies when considering level funding.
33:30 A summary of advice for level funding.

























