A Call to Action: Making Practice Guidelines More Helpful to Patient Care

In this episode of Derms and Conditions, host James Q. Del Rosso, DO, welcomes Joshua Burshtein, MD, chief dermatology resident at the University of Illinois Chicago, to discuss their recent Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology publication, Topical Prescription Therapy for Psoriasis: An Expert Position Paper on Limitations of Published Guidelines and Treatment Selection with Updated Recommendations. Their conversation examines the intended role of clinical practice guidelines, the limitations that emerge as therapeutics evolve, and why clinician judgment remains central to individualized psoriasis care.

They begin by defining what treatment guidelines are intended to accomplish: to provide an evidence-based framework for clinicians rather than a rigid set of rules. Dr Burshtein notes that although the paper focuses on topical psoriasis therapies, many of its core principles apply broadly across dermatology, particularly as rapid therapeutic advances challenge the ability of clinical guidelines to remain current.

Dr Del Rosso discusses the downstream effects of this disconnect, noting that guidelines are often treated as mandates by third-party payers despite disclaimers stating that they should not replace clinician judgment. The speakers emphasize that treatment decisions should remain patient-centered, with clinicians, insurers, and manufacturers all contributing to timely access to appropriate care.

They also explore additional limitations of clinical guidelines, including differences in methodology among organizations and the inability of any single document to encompass every available therapy. The discussion concludes with the importance of recognizing bias in guideline development while reinforcing that treatment selection should be guided by clinical evidence, physician expertise, and shared decision-making with the patient.

Tune in to the full episode to hear Drs Del Rosso and Burshtein discuss the evolving role of clinical guidelines, their limitations in everyday practice, and why individualized clinical judgment remains essential to psoriasis care.